The same laws that seek to protect children are being severely undermined by a total lack of common sense.
Australia has a sexual offender registry which was designed to assist the government authorities to keep track of the residence and activities of sex offenders. You don’t have to be Einstein to realise that being on that list is detrimental to that person’s ability to get a job, loan, sense of freedom and quality of life.
The registry is a vital tool in dealing with pedophiles. That is why I was astounded to read that children caught ‘sexting’ photos of themselves or friends have been put on this very list:
HUNDREDS of teenagers have been charged over producing or distributing child pornography amid growing concern that “sexting” has reached epidemic levels.
In the past three years, more than 450 child pornography charges have been laid against youths between the ages of 10 and 17, including 113 charges of “making child exploitation material”.
More than 160 charges were laid in 2010 alone – 26 more than in 2008.
Parents and communities continue to grapple with the issue of “sexting”, where sexual images are exchanged via SMS.
Teens who engage in sexting not only risk child pornography charges, but can also be listed alongside serial pedophiles and rapists on sexual offender lists.
Police confirmed that some juvenile offenders appear on Queensland’s sex offender registry.
Child psychologist Michael Carr-Gregg said “a lack of parental supervision” was a key factor.
“They’re ignorant of the law and no one’s ever sat them down and said ‘When you take a picture of yourself and send it, that’s child pornography’,” he said.
Dr Carr-Gregg said a conviction would have a “catastrophic” effect on a teenager’s future.
“If a young person is put on the sex offenders registry, they have to notify police every time they change their hair colour and wouldn’t easily get visas to places overseas, and it’s going to make employment difficult,” he said.
Don’t get me wrong, I am totally against the practice of “sexting”. I don’t like it one bit. But these kids are not sex offenders. One of the reasons children shouldn’t be ‘sexting’ in the first place is to make sure those images don’t get in the hands of a real sex offender.
The application of this law does 2 very serious things.
1. It paints children wrongly as sex offenders. This may have dire consequences down the track; and
2. Having ‘phony’ sex offenders on a sex offender registry completely undermines the registry in the first place. This is a very serious list, dedicated to sick and evil people. It shouldn’t be undermined by including silly kids who made poor choices.
It is time the Government stepped in and amended the law so common sense can be restored.
Like this:
Like Loading...
Topical Teaching 