Posts Tagged ‘News’

Teachers Are Not Their Students’ Parents

July 3, 2011

A teacher defends kissing, cuddling and touching the behind of a female student by claiming that is the way he treats his own children.  And how did the authorities respond to this pathetic defense of an indefensible action?  They bought it hook, line and sinker.

A TEACHER who kissed and cuddled a schoolgirl defended himself by saying that was how he treated his own children. Jeffrey Cave, who taught at Willows Primary School, in Basildon, also pulled a boy’s hair and then told him that was how “teachers used to handle misbehaving pupils”.

He was found guilty of unacceptable professional conduct and has been reprimanded by the General Teaching Council.

Mr Cave touched a girl pupil on her bottom over her clothing, allowed her to sit on his lap, kissed her head and cuddled her.

Mr Cave admitted in his witness statement kissing her head and cuddling her, but said that was the same way he showed affection to his own children.

He said during police interview he stroked the pupil’s bottom over clothing in a downwards motion to test if her trousers were dry.

The hearing heard Cave. who has had a clean professional history for 26 years. was going through a period of personal stress at the time of the incidents, and his actions were not sexually motivated.

I have no doubt that the soft “reprimand” response came about from his defense.  Their soft ruling sends a very bad message.  The public must be reasuured that teachers can not in any way show affection to students in the same way as parents do.  I am a parent too, but I have no right to treat my students like my children.

My message to all male teachers is to avoid being in a room alone with a student, act with professionalism and integrity at all times and keep your hands to yourself.

They are not your children, they are someone elses.

 

Maths Lessons Should be “Toughened Up”: Gove

June 30, 2011

Michael Gove might think that rigorous daily and weekly testing in maths is the answer, but my experience tells me that testing doesn’t work for all types of students.  There are some students that lift their game when tested.  Their competitive juices get going, and their drive to get a good grade is palpable.  Then there are students who need to learn in a less pressurised and more r
elaxed setting.  They freeze during formal testing, but progress extremely well when the focus is on the skill or concept rather than the grade.

Michael Gove disagrees:

All primary school children should be given daily maths lessons and weekly tests to stop pupils falling behind those from the Far East, Michael Gove suggested today. 

Mr Gove said schools should also “bear in mind” a system used in Shanghai where pupils have daily maths lessons and regular tests to “make sure that all children are learning the basics”.

What disappoints me as a Primary Maths teacher, is that in the quest for better results the focus becomes testing instead of engagement.  I believe that Maths can be taught in a turgid and lifeless way.  Conversely, it can be taught in an interesting, engaging and creative way.  Whilst constant testing will make students resent the subject, there are ways of teaching maths which can engage and excite students.

The answer to improving our students’ maths skills should not result in them hating the subject.



“Fight Club” School Uncovered and the School Defends it!

June 24, 2011

Twenty four students are suspended in South Australian school Stuart High for starting their own version of a Fight Club at lunchtime.

What makes this story so bizarre is that the school knew about it and didn’t take any action until footage was disseminated online.

The school’s principal says fight club had been going on for some time and they’ll now offer army cadet training for students to exercise instead.

Not only did the school know about it, but they initiated the club:

One of the parents Mick says it started off as an organised activity by the school itself.

“It was an organised activity at the school but the teacher never turned up, so the students took it into their own hands to organise their own exhibition.”

So what does the school Principal have to say about the violent exchanges occurring in the schoolyard every day?

School principal Veronica Conley said the fights were based on the movie Fight Club, and some of the students followed the film’s motto “whatever happens at Fight Club, stays at Fight Club”.

“It was not horrible, they were using boxing gloves and if anyone got hurt they stopped the fight and checked if he was all right,” Ms Conley told The Advertiser last night.

“Some of the parents were upset that we suspended everyone we identified on the footage, even those who were watching, but it was not safe, some schools have boxing at their school but it needs to be supervised.

“When you have kids this young and energetic they look to use that energy. We first became suspicious when we noticed they all failed to come to a soccer competition that occurred on the same day.”

You have got to be joking!  At least the Education Minister is horrified, right?  Nope!

“They went into an unused room and in groups, using boxing gloves, carrying out a fight club was, of course, unauthorised and from time to time some students were injured through that,” he said.

“All of the students who participated and all of the bystanders have been suspended by the school and all of the parents have been notified.”

What about the school?  Who is supervising?  Who suggested such a practise?  What about the Principal that seems to be defending her students’ right to box at lunch time?

What an awful response to a unnaceptable episode.

Youth Violence Blamed on Lack of Male Teachers

June 24, 2011

This one wins “The Long Bow Award” for the most absurd theory in education.

A Decline in the number of male teachers is being blamed for rising youth violence.

Adolescent psychologist Michael Carr-Gregg said the lack of male teachers was a major problem.

“We know males give something different to the developing boy than what female teachers give. To some extent we have lost that male narrative and left it to Hollywood to teach boys about masculinity,” he said.

The article is right though in suggesting there are very real reasons why males are not finding teaching an attractive career path:

Low pay, a perception that teaching is “women’s work”, and fears of being labelled a pedophile have been blamed for the reluctance of young men to teach.

As long as males don’t find this career path appealing, we are wrong in believing that we even have a shortage of male teachers to begin with.  There’s nothing worse than a teacher that doesn’t enjoy what he/she does.

I wonder if this frenzy to have more male teachers will inspire a new kind of sexual equality.  I wonder if the following methods will be employed to get potential male teachers interested:

– Pay them more than female teachers

– Offer a university fees rebate for male teachers

– Create quota systems for males in schools and universities.

I believe all these measures would be a mistake.  Essentially what we are looking for are good teachers not male teachers.  Whilst I hope men come to discover what a wonderful profession this is, I wouldn’t push it.

As for the lack of male teachers being blamed for youth violence, I very much doubt it.  Male teachers can have a very strong effect on male students in particular, but the theory is outrageous at best.

The Disappointing Response to the Schoolgirl Fight Saga

June 22, 2011

Yesterday, Australians were horrified when footage surfaced of a fight between Melbourne schoolgirls.  The clip was a reminder at just how ugly bullying can be, from the violent actions of the perpetrators to the feeble and gutless innaction of the bystanders.

To watch the clip please follow this link.

To add salt to the wounds, the response by professionals, ministers and educators have been extremely disappointing.  Take this uninspiring comment from State Education Minister, Martin Dixon:

He said the department also has a zero-tolerance approach to bullying.

All schools are required to have anti-bullying and cyber bullying policies in place that students are made aware of and expected to adhere to.

This extends to appropriate mobile phone use, he said.

Government ministers often coin the expression “zero-tolerance” because it sounds good.  But what does it really mean?  I looked up the department’s so-called “zero tolerance” approach on their website.  This is what it said:

All Victorian government schools are required to include anti-bullying strategies in their Student Engagement Policy (or their Student Code of Conduct).

Schools have a duty of care to take reasonable measures to prevent foreseeable risks of injury to their students.

Does that sound like “zero-tolerance” to you?

And the standard line of schools requiring anti-bullying policies is predictable, but ultimately, it’s just pure spin.  An anti-bullying policy, as I’ve argued here countless times, is just a piece of paper designed to ward off lawsuits.  It’s to show that schools have a plan.  The plan is usually quite vague, so as to avoid instances where they might be caught out not following their plan.  It is also useless in cases where teachers and principals are unaware that bullying is taking place.  Recent incidents have shown how blind schools have been to the bullying that pervades within its walls.

And if that’s not bad enough, psychologists and the media have decided to blame Facebook for this incident. But Facebook doesn’t pull a girls hair or drag them on the ground.  Bullies create bullying behaviours, not social media.  The medium is not the real issue here.  The real issue is that bullying exists, it is absolutely unnaceptable and must be seriously dealt with.  Not by programs or policies, but by a change of mindset and culture.

The very worst response we could have garnered from this awful exhibition of bullying is, “Oh, that’s just because of Facebook.”, or “That’s as a result of an ineffective anti-bullying policy.”

How many more incidents do we need to watch before we dispense with the spin and blame game and start to see this for what it is – a complex and delicate problem that requires much more attention.

 

Sickening Schoolgirl Fight Caught on Video

June 22, 2011


A terrible fight which erupted between two schoolgirls was caught on camera.  The video headlined tonight’s Channel 9 news broadcast and shows gutless bystanders just watching passively.

To watch this video follow this link.

Unfortunately we are in the age of simplistic answers to major problems.  In this case, it is not a culture of bullying that is blamed, but instead, Facebook:

BULLYING on Facebook has been blamed for a violent confrontation between two Melbourne schoolgirls caught on film by classmates unwilling to intervene.

A 14-year-old, who has remained anonymous, has told Channel 9 she was too afraid to go to school after repeated attacks by a 16-year-old girl from another school.

In the footage, recorded in February, the victim can be seen being dragged by her hair while she refuses to fight. She is then kicked in the head.

Students can be seen doing nothing to help her.

The older girl can be heard taunting her younger victim. When the victim goes to ground, the older girl says: “Just get up.”

The victim was dazed and coughing up blood.

The girl and her mother spoke out after five similar incidents in six months. The girl was terrified and unwilling to go to school or leave her family home in southeast Melbourne.

“When I leave school, if my bus isn’t there then I get petrified because my school is 30 seconds away from the station and she’s always there,” the girl said.

But she isn’t willing to give up hope that life will return to normal.

“Look, there’s always someone out there that loves you – you don’t have to feel like it’s just you – that’s how I felt for a long, long, long time,” she said.

The online jibes began in January, when it is alleged the bully posted insults on her Facebook page.

It escalated to the point where the girl claims bottles were thrown at her and threats were made towards her family.

The police became involved on Monday, but the mother of the alleged bully said there was more to the story. She blamed Facebook culture for an outbreak in bullying.

State Education Minister Martin Dixon said the department would be told to act once the police finished its inquiry.

“I was deeply appalled. … The type of behaviour shown should in no way be tolerated,” he said.

He said the department also has a zero-tolerance approach to bullying.

All schools are required to have anti-bullying and cyber bullying policies in place that students are made aware of and expected to adhere to.

This extends to appropriate mobile phone use, he said.

Facebook doesn’t create bullying incidents, bullies create bullying incidents.  This footage is horrible and the very worst conclusion we can reach is to shift the blame from bullies and passive bystanders to Facebook.  It’s almost as if people expect that if you take Facebook away bullies will stop bullying and start becoming friendly.  Hmmm …

How Can Handcuffing Students Ever Be Legal?

June 9, 2011

In Australia, if a school Prinicipal was seen to be authorising the handcuffing of students to polls, all hell would break loose!  The Principal would be sacked immediately, and the school would be faced with closure.  In America, it seems that it’s more complicated than that.

A recent school alleged to have shackled its students for hours at a time needs to have been proven contravene a rule that allows handcuffing of kids in certain instances, before legal action  can be imposed.

US civil rights activists have filed a lawsuit against a school they claim shackled children to railings and poles to punish misbehaviour.

Five pupils at Capital City Alternative School in Jackson, Mississippi, claim staff there handcuffed by their wrists, and sometimes the ankles too, for up to six hours at a time.

Some say they were forced to eat lunch while handcuffed, and had to shout to be released to use the bathroom, sometimes unsuccessfully.

They allege school principals often ordered the shackling, WLBT reported.

The Southern Poverty Law Centre filed a lawsuit naming Jackson Public Schools and Capital City Alternative School officials and seeking class-action status on behalf of all the school’s students.

The complaint says the alleged punishments violate the US Constitution and school board policy.

The centre’s director, attorney Jody Evans, said that the policy states students can only be handcuffed if they present a danger to themselves or others, or if they are destroying property.

‘In these instances, none of these occurred. Students were simply (saying) I forgot my belt today, have the wrong shoes on. They were handcuffed,’ he said, according to WLBT.

Critics of the Capital City Alternative School in Jackson say the allegedly excessive punishment makes students more likely to drop out of school – and commit crimes later in life.

The school admits pupils in grades 4-12 who have been suspended or expelled from Jackson Public Schools for 10 days or longer.

School district officials said the agency takes the allegations seriously and will respond through legal channels.

It deeply upsets me that schools should ever have the authority to handcuff students.  That’s the job of the police.  Misissippi needs to change their education policy quickly.  It is not acceptable for this practice to be allowed in any form.

Newsflash: Bullying Was Around Before Facebook

June 5, 2011

I’ve maintained frequently on this blog that cyber bullying is a major concern.  The rise of social networking sites like Facebook has meant that bullying is more rampant and invasive now than it’s ever been. But let’s not forget that cyber bullying is a manifestation of conventional bullying – and that cannot be blamed on Facebook.

That’s why I find then following article troubling:

CHILDREN as young as eight are being treated for anxiety problems triggered by social-networking sites.

Psychologists say modern technology is producing a growing number of children needing therapy to deal with distress arising from posts on Facebook and other sites.

Darryl Cross, a clinical psychologist from Crossways Consulting, said anxiety caused by technology was a growing concern.

“Modern-day technologies and social-networking sites are contributing significantly to child and adolescent anxiety,” he said.

“It is an international phenomenon.”

Although anxiety was an established disorder, more modern triggers were lead to more distressed teenagers, Dr Cross said.

“But also, it’s the ability to be in contact 24/7.”

“In previous generations, you had the telephone and if you were lucky, mum and dad let you make a call after you got home from school. But now, primary school children, not to mention adolescents, have mobiles, which means they are constantly in touch via text messages and Facebook.”

Dr Cross said children used networking sites to determine their identity and form a view of what society thought of them.

Clinical psychologist at The Children’s Psychology Clinic, Dr Elizabeth Seeley-Wait, said she was seeing kids suffering anxiety about “being out of touch or out of the loop” if they had their mobile phone taken away.

Adults are also falling victim to insecurities.

Equilibrium Psychology’s Gemma Cribb said Facebook came up in couples’ therapy. “Someone will check their partner’s Facebook and questions will come up such as ‘Where did you meet this friend?’ ” she said.

Whilst I am very weary of children having a Facebook page, especially under the age of 13, I think it’s important to note that the bullying itself is more important than the medium.  Whilst mediums change, what doesn’t seem to change are the bullies.

What is being done about it?

Sure school’s will give you their standard assortment of “P” words, like ‘policies’, ‘programs’ and ‘procedures’, to reassure you that they are taking decisive action, but these provisions are just there to avoid lawsuits.  The effect of policies and programs are minimal at best, and if there really was stringent consequences handed out, would there be such a huge problem?

Here’s some “P” words of my own – we need a more solid partnership between Principals, Parents and Practitioners.  We need schools to be as concerned about their culture and as passionate about the safety of their students as they are about their numbers, finances and academic reputation.  We need parents to be aware of how their children treat others and raise them to respect others rather than undermine, bully or belittle them.  And we need teachers to continue to fight for their students.

We have a choice, we can blame it all on the juggernaut that is Facebook, or we can fight bullying at its source whilst standing up for the rights of those who are victimised and powerless.

Eight-Year Old’s Gift To Teacher is a Gun!

June 4, 2011

I appreciate the kindness of parents and students when they write me a short note or give me a gift at the end of the year.  It makes me feel appreciated.  However, if any parent or student is thinking about giving me a loaded gun as a gift, I would beg them to please abstain.  Such gifts I don’t need.

An elementary school teacher in Florida was shocked when she received a loaded gun as an end of the school year present, which turns out was unknowingly packed with the real gift.

A memo from the school principal at Allamanda Elementary explained that a teacher opened a gift at home she found a small handgun at the bottom of the box.

“Where’s the parents at? Where’s the parents of this child? I mean, how did he obtain this gun?” asked parent Jarrett Goddard.

School officials dispersed the news quickly.

A spokesperson for the Palm Beach County School District said in a statement that school police are investigating a report that a student at the school may have given a teacher a gift in a box that also contained a small handgun.

It also said that no one was injured and the investigation is continuing, and no further information is available at this time.

Officials said the student’s grandmother packed the present but didn’t know there was a gun inside the box.

It’s unclear how the gun got there, but it was never in the student’s hands.

What happened to the good old apple?  It’s nutritious and you can’t shoot anything with it.

It’s Time For Schools To Shape Up

May 31, 2011

Some schools just don’t get it!  Their job goes beyond education.  They are looking after people’s kids!  Schools are duty bound to actually look after the safety of their students (as opposed to just saying they do in a catchy but meaningless slogan).  They must understand that parents don’t give the responsibility of having others look after their kids lightly.  It’s not like giving over the keys to your car to the valet.  It’s a huge deal.

That’s why schools must do their utmost to earn the confidence and respect of their parents.  They must be actively protecting the students whilst also communicating regularly with parents.  To have a school issue a dictate that all students wear baggy clothes to ward off probable paedophiles is a disgrace!  How is a parent supposed to take that advice?

Furious parents yesterday criticised a school after they were asked to buy their children baggy clothes to deter paedophiles.

King’s Park Secondary School, in Glasgow, asked parents to ensure modesty in their children’s uniform in a bizarre letter which claims sex offenders may be taking pictures of schoolboys in tight trousers.

The letter, dubbed ‘paranoid in the extreme’ by one parent, was sent home even though police say there have been no incidents of schoolchildren in the area being targeted.

And children whose parents fail to conform to the approved dress code could be forced to miss out on fun school trips.

The letter says: ‘We believe an appropriate school uniform protects children from being targeted by sexual predators.

‘There is recent evidence in south Glasgow of adults photographing schoolgirls in short skirts and schoolgirls/boys in tight trousers, then grooming them through the internet.

‘We must do all we can to keep our children safe. A modest school uniform is more appropriate than fashion skirts, trousers or tops.’

The crackdown on pupil attire has been slammed by shocked parents whose children don’t want to obey the strict rules.

One blasted: ‘There is no way an ugly uniform is going to deter a predator and determined sex offender.

‘This is just paranoid in the extreme. There are better ways to safeguard children than spreading needless panic.’

Another added: ‘It is laughable to think the uniform can act as some sort of paedophile-repellent.’

The tough new policy forces cash-strapped parents to shop from an approved list of items available only at high street store Marks and Spencer.

Girls can wear only knee-length pleated skirts or trousers and boys loose-fitting trousers.

This is an awful thing to do to parents.  To play on their fears and insight paranoia is just unacceptable.  I am glad Australian schools aren’t so stupid and downright insensitive!