Archive for the ‘Professional Conduct’ Category

Drunk Lecturer Forces Students to Sit 23-Hour Exam Without Toilet Breaks

July 4, 2012

Incredible story! Interesting that no student sitting the test stood up to her during the exam:

A drunk lecturer at a Russian university forced her students to sit a 23-hour-long exam – not even allowing them toilet breaks.

Lecturer Landysh Zaripova, however, frequently left the room and students claim it was to top up her drink.

Students said Physics lecturer Zaripova ‘stank of alcohol’.

One student told the Russian media: ‘Towards the end, everyone was just sitting there, totally exhausted.

‘The lecturer would go into another room, drink, come back and start telling us about her business.’

The exam started at 10am on June 26 and went on overnight finishing at 9am the following morning.

The incident took place in the Russian province of Tatarstan at Kazan State University in the province’s capital.

‘Do you think I am stupid enough to come to class drunk?’ Zaripova told Russian newspaper L!fe News.

 She claims she was sober and that the students decided to take revenge on her for failing them.

The head of the University’s Physics Department, Albert Aganov, denied that the lecturer was under the influence of alcohol. He said: ‘I would have fired her immediately, if I had seen her drunk.’

He added that even if the allegations were found to be true it would not lead to the dismissal of Zaripova as she is on a 5 year contract which cannot be broken.

If only the rest of society had such trusting and supportive bosses. Job security must be very high among Russian academics.

Come to think of it, I’ve sat for exams that have felt 23-hours long.

The Science Experiment that was Always Going to go Wrong

July 3, 2012

Talk about a science experiment that didn’t turn out well:

A teacher on the New South Wales Central Coast has pleaded not guilty to assault charges, after he allegedly dared a group of students to hold dry ice with their bare hands.

Damien Hilton is facing eight charges, including cause grievous bodily harm by neglect, after a group of Terrigal High School students were injured during his science class earlier this year.

The 49-year-old, who was employed as a casual teacher, is accused of daring 10 children to hold dry ice for as long as they could.

The students were treated for burns, with two taken to hospital.

Hilton faced Gosford Local Court today and pleaded not guilty to the charges.

The matter has been adjourned until next month.

It’s Confirmed: Topless Lesbian Romps in the Classroom are Prohibited

June 30, 2012

Just in case you thought that only teachers who give zeroes lose their job:

A Manhattan judge has denied a petition by a New York City teacher to win her job back after she was fired for engaging in inappropriate behavior in 2009.

Cindy Mauro, a 34-year-old French teacher at Brooklyn’s James Madison High School, was caught half naked in a classroom, ‘kneeling between the legs’ of a topless fellow teacher, an arbitrator found.

Mauro and her alleged lover, 32-year-old Alini Brito, had vehemently denied allegations of a ‘lesbian lovefest.’ The 34-year-old claimed that she was only helping Brito deal with her diabetes by bringing her some candy to raise her blood glucose levels.

Both teachers also denied they were ever naked, alleging that the custodian who walked in on them during a school talent show had a vivid imagination, the New York Daily News reported.

Imagine if she had been caught naked whilst giving a zero on a student’s assignment? All hell would have broken loose!

Shocking Video of a Student Being Beaten Up by a Teacher

June 28, 2012

It is still to early to make assumptions but the footage does not look good:

A newspaper story and video of George Westinghouse Career and Technical Education High School shop teacher and security dean Stephan Hudson manhandling freshman Kristoff John, found its way to the front cover and website of the Daily News today, months after the March 6 attack, which left John with a sore back and a reputation as the aggressor in the incident. Indeed, John’s mother, Diane John, was told her son attacked the teacher and that they were doing him a favor by not disciplining him—and she took the word of Hudson and school officials over her son, who insisted he did nothing wrong and didn’t deserve the beating. John later transferred out of the school and, eventually, his mother sent him to his native Grenada to live with relatives.

But when the Daily News showed Diane John the tape, she was absolutely shocked and is now demanding the police and the city’s Department of Education investigate the incident. “They lied to me!” the betrayed mom said tearfully when The News showed her the clip for the first time. “No one wants to see their son taken advantage of and beaten like this.”

Natalie Munroe Can Now Look for a Suitable Job

June 28, 2012

Amongst all the hysteria and the freedom of speech proponents leaping to Natalie Munroe’s defense, I wrote a post claiming that she was no hero and that her actions showed a terrible lack of judgement.

For those that don’t remember, Ms. Munroe is the teacher that called her students “frightfully dim, lazy whiners” on her blog.

Now it turns out that (surprise, surprise) she may not have been a very good teacher to begin with:

A high school teacher who branded her students ‘frightfully dim’ and ‘lazy whiners’ on a scathing blog has finally been fired for her ‘unsatisfactory performance’.

Natalie Munroe’s blog garnered nationwide attention when it was discovered by her students in February 2011, and she was suspended.

The English teacher was allowed to return to Central Bucks High School East in Philadelphia, but her classes were monitored by other staff.

Now the school board has dismissed Munroe, who taught 11th grade, by a 7-0 vote based on a year of class observations.

‘Ms. Munroe was, at best, a satisfactory teacher and was experiencing performance difficulties well before her blog became an issue,’ the board’s president, Paul Faulkner, said, the Philadelphia Inquirer reported.

Perhaps Ms. Munroe could entertain becoming a professional blogger.

Teacher and Four Students Arrested in Alleged Hazing Case

June 25, 2012

More horrible news that will taint our wonderful profession:

A Southern California high school teacher has been arrested on suspicion of directing students to assault another student in a classroom hazing incident.

Fontana police said Sunday that 27-year-old Emmanuel De La Rosa, along with four other students, were arrested on Saturday.

Police alleged that De La Rosa facilitated some students to carry out the hazing to curb behavioral problems in the classroom at AB Miller High School. Police declined to describe the nature of the hazing, citing the ongoing investigation. At least one student suffered minor injuries.

The Riverside Press-Enterprise reports (http://bit.ly/Ocffl5) that an 18-year-old student arrested in the case faces charges of assault, child cruelty and attempted sodomy.

De La Rosa was booked for investigation of child endangerment.

Why Can’t Teachers Touch Kids any More? :O’Brien

June 21, 2012

I couldn’t disagree more with the opinions expressed in Susie O’Brien’s column today. Allowing teachers to touch students, even innocently, is a step backwards. Every day we read news articles of teachers who have misused the privilege of working with kids and have overstepped the boundaries. It’s because of the evil minority that continue to heap shame on our wonderful profession, that these regulations are vital.

The rules that restrict teachers from hugging and touching our students without justifiable cause are not about political correctness, they are about common sense.  They exist to protect students, but in doing so, they also protect teachers from false accusations. I agree that it’s a sad state of affairs that I am obliged to keep my door open when having a private meeting with a student, but isn’t that a small price to pay for transparency?

I find Ms. O’Brien’s intimation that I can’t provide my students with the same standard of care due to the fact that I don’t touch them quite upsetting:

WHY can’t teachers touch kids any more? It used to be that teachers had total control over the children in their care.

They were allowed to hit them, cane them and handle them in pretty much any way they saw fit.

But they could also hug them, comfort them, and even check their hair for nits.

With the advent of political correctness, everything changed.

Teachers should be able to judge for themselves what contact is appropriate in any situation.

If we think any teacher lacks the ability to make such judgments, then they shouldn’t be in front of our classrooms.

For instance, take a look at the rules imposed on teachers in this state by the Victorian Institute of Teaching, which is the professional regulation body.

Their code of conduct says teachers are violating their professional relationships when they touch a student without a valid reason.

It’s a bit depressing that it’s come to this.

The code says teachers can touch students, but goes on to say it is a “difficult issue for teachers in the present climate”.

Apparently, teachers can touch students for comfort, guidance or acknowledgment, but not for any other reason.

And teachers are not meant to have any meeting with a student alone with their door closed.

It seems a pretty sad state of affairs.

As sad as it is that the evil few spoil it for the majority, these rules are vital. They protect teachers and students alike.

The Classroom isn’t the Best Place to Rectreate Famous Movie Moments

June 2, 2012


Finding a humourous way to let an unruly student know that they have overstepped the mark can be quite effective. It lets them know that you are disappointed in them without a loss of anger or creating a big scene.

However, when attempting to use humour in this way, please follow the following rules:

1. Never humiliate the student;

2. Never humiliate the student; and

3. Never, ever, humiliate the student!

Public humiliation is a huge demotivator, and it really hurts the same child you are supposed to be nurturing.

When a teacher decided to communicate displeasure in a student by reprising a scene from the hit movie Bridesmaids, the teacher didn’t just manage to break all three rules, but also managed to add violence into the mix:

THE family of a California high school student has failed to see the funny side of a teacher imitating a scene from the hit comedy “Bridesmaids” and allegedly trying to slap some sense into the girl.

Dionne Evans, a ninth grade student at Malibu High School, alleges that when she forgot to bring her homework to class on May 22 she was called to the front of the room and the unnamed teacher asked, “Did you see Bridesmaids?”

The teacher then allegedly slapped the girl’s face up to six times, TMZ reported.

It is believed the teacher was referring to a scene in the 2011 movie where one woman literally tries to slap some sense into another.

Evans’ family have filed a complaint with the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department. A spokesperson for the sheriff’s Special Victims Unit confirmed to the Santa Monica Daily Press that they are investigating the incident.

The teacher has since written an apology to Evans but her family have hired an attorney and are reportedly considering a civil lawsuit against the Santa Monica-Malibu Unified School District.

“My client has not been back to the class, she’s been doing her school work in the library,” attorney Donald Karpel told the Daily Press.

“She has been humiliated and devastated. She will be seeking counseling. It has been horrible.”

Bridesmaids, starring Kristen Wiig and Annie Mumolo, centered on a series of misfortunes suffered by Wiig’s character after she is asked to serve as maid of honor for her best friend.

Some suggestions for other movies best left out of the classroom:

1. Fight Club

2. Bad Teacher

3. Kill Bill

 

Students Set-Up Their Teacher and Destroy Her Career

May 31, 2012

Just because young Julie Warning was framed for having a relationship with a student doesn’t in any way excuse her behaviour. It was extremely mean-spirited and heartless for Eric Arty and his friends to collect bets on who would successfully be the first to kiss her, but regardless, a great deal more is expected of teachers than to be involved personally with a student.

Over the course of the next few days there will be a lot written about Julie Warning, yet, possibly not enough criticism levelled at Eric Arty and his friends. Their role in this saga should not go unpunished. Their bet was quite shocking and should not be tolerated by the school hierarchy. They should be expelled for their little gambling venture.

Expelled? But they were just being kids?

They were exhibiting behaviour which was quite misogynistic, terribly destructive to a young woman’s reputation and career and downright immoral.

Keeping them at the school will not only give the school a bad name, but will turn these pranksters into heroes and celebrities among the student body. This is not an acceptable outcome.

A high school teacher filmed in a passionate embrace with a pupil fell victim to a $500 bet between five friends about who could kiss her first, it emerged today.

Eric Arty, 18, beat his friends to the jackpot after the student and four friends put in $100 for a race to romance their global studies teacher Julie Warning, 26.

Andrew Cabrera, a junior at Manhattan Theater Lab HS, where Warning worked until Tuesday, told the New York Post: ‘It was a bet with a group of his friends. They gave him the $500 [pot].’

Speaking about Arty’s seduction, he said: ‘He would go after class and basically try to seduce her.

‘I don’t know if she knew [about the bet]. They were all trying to get with her.

‘One of his [Arty’s] friends flirted with her more than anyone — I thought he would be the one, but Eric came out of nowhere and got her.’

The affair was revealed yesterday by The New York Post — which ran a front-page picture of the pair kissing on Friday at Bleecker Playground in Greenwich Village and published the video online.

The case has been turned over to the Department of Education Special Commissioner of Investigations and Warning was reassigned.

However, school officials said Warning did not report to her new job yesterday and could not be reached for comment.

Schools Chancellor Dennis Walcott said: ‘It’s my understanding that she did not show up to her reassignment center.

‘So we’ll do more investigating on why she hasn’t shown up.’