Archive for the ‘Naplan’ Category

There’s a Reason Why Teachers Cheat

January 3, 2011

Let me say this right off the bat – I don’t approve of cheating.  It is unethical and lacks integrity for teachers to cheat.  But let’s not let that discount the likely reasons behind their dishonesty.

It’s called the NAPLAN – Australia’s version of the infamous national test.  And as the recent case in South Australia highlights, it can bring out the worst in some teachers:

A PRIMARY school teacher has been sacked and another reprimanded for cheating in national tests.

A former St Leonards Year 7 teacher was stood down following an investigation by the Education Department into her administration of the NAPLAN tests in May last year.

Correne Woolmer, who joined the Glenelg school at the beginning of 2010, admitted changing answers on a student’s test.

Ms Woolmer isn’t the only teacher to get caught, and she certainly isn’t the only teacher to cheat on the test.  I’m sure many more teachers have gotten away with doing the same thing.

The NAPLAN test like other National tests around the globe have an important function.  Their job is to give information to parents about their childs’ progress, which includes a comparison against all others taking the test in that age group.

But what it also does is set up the teacher.  The teacher carries the blame for the results.  It is the teacher that is the first port of call when parents seek an explanation – it is the teacher that is labelled as insufficient when the school analyses the data.

Such pressures lead teachers to teach for the test rather than the typical authentic adherence to the curriculum.  This is not the way teachers are supposed to teach.  It also puts more pressure on teachers.  Teachers are already under significant strain.  We must be mindful that this system puts them in a situation where their performance is scrutinised like never before.  And finally, a test is just a guide.  It is not a perfect form of assessment.  Many factors can cloud and effect the conclusions made by the data such as student anxiety, outliers etc.

Cheating is wrong, and teachers that cheat deserve to be punished.  But somehow I feel that by administering national tests, teachers are getting punished regardless.

Does the NAPLAN Have Any Friends?

November 1, 2010

Professor Brian Caldwell, a former dean of education at the University of Melbourne, is the latest epert to criticise the NAPLAN testing.  Speaking to a Senate inquiry into National Assessment Program – Literacy and Numeracy (NAPLAN), he said that the program, and website, should be phased out.

“Essentially, I propose a sunset on current approaches to NAPLAN and My School and adoption of benchmark practice.”

Professor Caldwell proposed that a survey based on a sample of students would be enough to yield national information, rather than testing all students.

As a teacher, I believe that while it is important to monitor schools against a set of national benchmarks, the NAPLAN tests works against the natural instincts of the standard harworking teacher.  Principals instruct their teachers, not to teach for learnings sake, but rather to teach the skills and content covered in the tests.  So even though I taught a unit on persuasive writing in Term 2, my school wants me to cover it again in Term 4 because they heard it was the writing genre selected for the NAPLAN.

Shouldn’t the NAPLAN promte real teaching instead of depriving teachers from going about their jobs the way they should?

NAPLAN vs Core Values

October 28, 2010

The wife of Tasmanian Governor Peter Underwood, Frances Underwood, who trained as a primary educator in 1980 delivered the 2010 William Oats Memorial Lecture last night entitled “Nourishing the Spirit in the 21st century: a Challenge for Education.”

Mrs Underwood says that education must get back to core values.

“The real challenges and opportunities for education in the 21st century will only be met by re-assessing our obsession with performance testing being the only measure of educational success and by enabling well-educated passionate and creative teachers, who are at the forefront of knowledge and skill, to fire up the imagination and motivation of students,” she said.

Test like Naplan clearly put a great deal of pressure on teachers and students alike.  Whilst I think it holds lesser teachers to account for their sloppiness, it complicates and stifles the average, hardworking teacher.  Whilst I’m not sure about what “core values”really means, performance testing seems to be quite problematic.