It Only Took 49 Complaints For This Teacher to Get the Boot

george-steele

It’s a bad look when it takes this long for a teacher who is seemingly unfit for the classroom is finally dismissed:

 

A teacher who allegedly let students play knife games, and failed to supervise a student who set fire to a book in class has been barred from teaching.

The food technology teacher was also accused of asking a student, “do you have your period” when she asked to use the bathroom.

George Steele worked at Mill Park Secondary College for three terms in 2013 and was the subject of 49 formal complaints during that time.

The litany of complaints was detailed in a decision handed down by the Victorian Institute of Teaching, who found that Mr Steele had engaged in misconduct and cancelled his registration as of March 11.

The former chef allegedly told a female student that “girls need to clean up after the boys”.

Another student said he told her to “drink a cup of concrete and harden up” when she asked for some help on a recipe.

Students also complained that the teacher ate all the food they made in the cooking class.

It was alleged that Mr Steele pulled a baseball hat over his head and nodded off on a train while he was meant to be supervising students on an excursion. He was also accused of losing a student’s work, storing beer in a fridge in the classroom, and letting Year 12 food technology students watch Border Security. He allegedly posted a photo on the school’s staff portal of a student in his class “playfully” threatening another student with a knife.

One teacher described his teaching style as “disorganised” and “haphazard”.

In an email provided to the hearing, one teacher spoke of how she smelt smoke in the corridor and asked Mr Steele if anything was on fire. “Seconds later, he came into the prep room and confirmed that student 1 set a student’s workbook on fire.” It was also alleged that he let students play a knife game in class “where they used a fork to stab between their fingers as quickly as possible”.

The school acted within a few weeks of Mr Steele commencing his job, and tried to provide support to improve his teaching practices. The Department of Education terminated Mr Steele’s employment after an unsatisfactory probationary period at the end of term 3, 2013.

The school’s principal gave evidence at the hearings, and said the teacher made “disparaging remarks about the school being run by ‘power crazed women’.”

Mr Steele did not attend the formal hearing, but provided written evidence to the merit protection board and responded to the principal’s complaints. He denied sleeping on the train and said he had a stress headache made worse by sunlight, which is why he pulled his cap over his eyes. The teacher denied posting the photos of students playing with the knives and said students had occasionally used his computer for various reasons.  

He said he would not have asked a girl if she had her period and encouraged students to become independent learners. The sacked teacher said he was being punished for not implementing the school’s rigid teaching model focused on explicit instruction, “spoon feeding” and rote learning.

But the VIT disciplinary panel said Mr Steele was “simply unable to provide a safe and supportive environment, either physically or psychologically, for effective learning to occur”.

 

Click on the link to read How Does a Teacher Stop an Out of Control Classroom Fight

Click on the link to read Teacher Hires Hitman to Kill Her Student

Click on the link to read Teachers Who Have Sex With Students Deserve Jail Time!

Click on the link to read Drama is Taught Very Differently Than It Used To

Advertisements

Tags: ,

2 Responses to “It Only Took 49 Complaints For This Teacher to Get the Boot”

  1. aiyshah2014 Says:

    I completely agree about how it took way too long for this teacher to get fired, but as an employer, I know that (certainly in the country I work in), it is extremely difficult to get rid of a teacher unless they murder someone or commit a crime unrelated to the school and are convicted of it. Simple negligence and disparaging remarks would be considered petty nuisances and just needed to be dealt with by the head of school.

    So as a result I have decided to be really tough in terms of the recruitment process…which sometimes is not easy when you may be desperate for a teacher.

    I’m just saying ‘firing someone who you know should be gone’ is sometimes not as easy as it sounds….

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: